Jeff of Narduzzi Nation captures the plight in a note yesterday where he said, "Unfortunately, just about every house we would want to buy in our area is out of our price range, and as much as we want to stretch ourselves to buy our dream home, we don't want to be 'house poor'."
Two income families, even without the expense of children, can't always be assumed to have enough cash to move up the real estate ladder here in the Bay Area. Barring a tremendous income for each, a good chunk of the money coming home is going back into the mortgage, or the rent, some going to principal, but a great deal just going to the interest - your monthly thank you note to the bank for letting you live in their place...
It's obviously a catch-22. If you buy a $400k home and watch it appreciate, to $500k or $600k, the added equity you achieve doesn't even match the corresponding increase in that $600k or $800k home you were eyeing. If one assumes that mid-level market home prices are increasing at the same rate as more expensive homes, you don't get closer to the next rung up in the ladder by hoping for increased equity. Instead, you'll get further away. The difference can only be made up in three ways:
- Increased savings overall, in parallel with limited spending
- A dramatic increase in income, which in turn, allows for #1
- Simply moving out of the area to a place more affordable
But if you believe in the Silicon Valley, and you want to make a life here, rather than leave the area in the hopes to achieving the American Dream of a two-story house, two car garage, and more than an acre of green grass, you just might be stuck on this hamster wheel of sorts, running in place, while not getting any more near to your goal. At church, I've seen many couples, once they start having children, realize they can't afford to grow a family in the Bay Area, and can't take on a larger home with more bedrooms for the kids. I know many families who have left, headed for less-costly pastures in Texas and the Mountain states (Colorado, Utah, etc.)
My wife and I own a 2-bedroom condo, which is good enough for the two of us, and our 17+ year old beagle, and we've watched as the value of the home, and those in the complex have increased, but I don't feel as if we are any closer to leaving the condo and getting a stand-alone home this year than we were last year, or the one before that, or the one before that. The only way our lifestyle will change is if either of us see points #2 (a dramatic increase in income) or #3 (we move out). We don't intend to go anywhere, but if it came down it, we would have to exchange one dream for another, and become new residents somewhere else. Somewhere without the brain power of the Valley. Somewhere away from the action. Somewhere with a slower, less expensive way of life.
Is there a way out of this issue? How can we expect the value of our own home to increase beyond the rate our target home is increasing? Seems like we can't win.
A few items to think about:
ReplyDelete1. Saving more is possible. Most people tend to spend way more than they should. Obviously, I have no idea about your financials but I have seen people save up for first homes or larger homes. Did it happen overnight? Of course not, but it can happen.
2. You can also get the value of your home to increase faster than other homes with some simple fixes. Planting trees, adding solar panels, fixing up a run down property are all possibilities. My in laws are currently in their third years of fixing up an older home in San Jose. They're putting in a lot of sweat equity but their equity appreciation is much higher than the valley average.
Gal
Some links for you (especially read the comments)
ReplyDeletehttp://finance.yahoo.com/expert/article/careerist/38221
http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2007/07/the_suburbanist_paradox.php
Although I enjoy living in California and the weather here, I definitely question whether it's worth taking on such a huge mortgage especially if it doesn't enable one to save for retirement (leaving one house-poor).
When I went to college in Oregon all the locals complained about Californians coming in and snatching up the $75K to $150K homes and bidding the prices up. Now those homes are $400K which still looks awfully cheap. Now, I see the other side of the story and now that we're californians, everything elsewhere looks like it's on sale.
I think you can see what exit strategy of the hamster wheel I'm hinting at.